

The "Art" of Animal Cruelty
Tell San Francisco Art Institute to remove snuff video exhibit from gallery
Walk into the Walter and McBean Galleries in San Francisco's posh Russian Hill neighborhood, and you may be shocked to see what passes for contemporary "art" these days. Six televisions display video images of six different animals -- a doe, a goat, a horse, an ox, a pig, and a sheep -- being bludgeoned to death with a large sledgehammer by "artist" Adel Abdessemed of Paris. Entitled "Don't Trust Me," this sick exhibit is Abdessemed's and the Institute's self-serving attempt to pass off the brutal abuse and killing of animals as legitimate artistic creation.
What such "artists" and their patrons overlook is that animals are living beings who feel and suffer just like we humans -- and we are no more justified in taking their lives at will than we have the right to kill another person. Such abuse of animals may elicit horror and disgust in viewers, but that does not qualify it as art. Far from it -- in fact, "Don't Trust Me" represents the very worst impulses of the human imagination.
It takes no artistic talent or ability to kill animals, and Abdessemed should have never been given a venue for his sickening "work" in the first place. To their great discredit, the San Francisco Art Institute agreed to sponsor this exhibit, lending it an air of credibility, but what makes matters worse are the obscene rationalizations this venerable institution of learning and culture offers in defense of the sleazy snuff films. These include pedantic claims that such killings "regularly take place...in the real world, on a regular basis," and that the installation "(makes) typical moral and cultural constraints seem beside the point."
Such statements betray not only a lack of compassion and basic human decency, but also a fundamental confusion of true artistic creation with the destruction of life. Abdessemed's work is of no artistic value, and rather than raise people's consciousness about the cruelties committed against animals every day, it will encourage them to accept animal abuse as a way of gaining attention and notoriety.
To call someone who murders animals an "artist" is an insult to every real artist who refuses to rely on violence and shallow, sensationalistic gimmicks to express his or her vision. While the work of such murderers will surely not endure, their antics may encourage and incite others to torture and kill animals, so it is crucial that people of conscience voice our outrage over this monstrous display of cruelty.
This exhibition was sponsored by David Zwirner. David Zwirner exhibits this artist.
Please call him to tell him what you think of this disgusting exhibition. David obviously is confused about the difference between art and reality. Art may have images of death but art does not cause death nor does it participate in murder.
3/25/08
Snuff "Art"
Posted by
warm jet
at
25.3.08
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
9 comments:
I can't believe you're shocked about this WJ?! Art is all about shock,look at the religious bigotry that is considered cool in the art world! Who decides the norm? The elites? I for one think artists should be able to express whatever they want in their art,regardless if it offends you or anyone else.It's a first amendment right dammit! You need to relax and quit being so uptight about people offending your sensibilities.
seems like that would be illegal in most countries.
This exhibition is total fucking bullshit. And the issue has nothing to do with people being offended.
the real offense is the moral disconnect between outrage at this so called artistic experience... (which I personally find atrocious) ... and the daily, numbed acceptance that we all participate in concerning the bloody flesh that finds it's way to most of our dinner plates, sandwiches, and/or "snacks".
nary a thought as to how the estimated 1 billion a year..yes, 1 billion animals..primarily cattle, pig, poultry, and sheep live and..die.. in this country to feed our misplaced notion of nutrition and natural diet.
I do agree with the exhibits title.."Don't trust me..", but there are so many other ways to make the point ...and lets consider for just a moment, what is the effect of all this slaughter on our williness to accept human violence and murder as a normal state of affairs?
bottom line with animals, and humans,..."as you do to the least among you..so you do to me"
just sick
Dr. Robert stated his point far more eloquently than I. My comment was indeed reactionary which is, I'm sure, part of the point. It's a frustrating approach regardless of the point he is trying to make.
I find this atrocious too,my point being that the many artists use shock to make up for ineptness."Hey let's shock the religious folks,they're an easy target,or rich people,or capitalists. When it touches your own beliefs, then it's personally offensive, I guess.
Fuckin A mother fucker!
The DR. is always.....on!
I would agree with all he said and how it was said.
Waiting for the Dr. Blog?
s
Post a Comment